I installed my new Tusk cab extender today. Total wieght was about 44 pounds without the spare tire carrier. The ground clearance hardly changed, maybe 1/16 inch, and I don't really consider that outside tolerance of just bouncing the rear end and measuring again. Throwing the spare tire carrier in the bed didn't make any measurable differance, but adding the spare tire lowered the GC by an 1/8", with a total added weight of 46 pounds for the carrier and tire. So, with the cage, tire and carrier added, it was an even 90 pounds, with about 3/16" initial change in GC. However, after bouncing the rear a few times, it consistantly stopped at the original 12 1/2" ground clearance. Interesting. I don't plan on using the spare tire carrier unless I do some desert riding this summer. My buddy has plans on a coyote hunt for us when it warms up a little.
As a side note, there was an electronic device (it looked like a self containd diode bridge rectifier, but I don't know off-hand what it is) that was attached to one of the bumper mounting holes. It was behind the mount and bolted on a plastic stand-off. I had to relocate it in order to mount the cab extender. I am intentionally calling it a cab extender even though many call it a cage extender. Polaris doesn't call their rider enclosure a cage, but rather a cab. This was pointed out to me in another thread. I think it is prudent to point this out and try to change the thinking of anyone that believes they have a ROPS certified roll cage. It is a ROPS certified passenger "cab". I don't want anyone feeling too safe - as I did before my roll-over incident. Pictures to follow in another message.
I am not one to complaing too much (please don't ask my wife about that though) but if there was anything that was a little bit frustrating, it would be that the threaded bolt holes were full of paint. That made it somewhat difficult to put the upper clamps together and my t-handle allen wrench was pretty much useless bacause it took too much force to turn the bolts without using the long part if the wrench. The kit was beautiful and everthing was double wrapped, first in plasctic, then in bubble-wrap. There were no scrapes, chips or mars in the paint job. Of course, as mentioned elsewhere in another thread, it was not powder coated. Durability of the finish may be an issue.
One oddity, the instructions call for lock-washers on both the bolt and the nylock where the upper tubes connect to the lower brush guard with flanges. I can't see using lock washers on a nylock in the first place, let alone a second lockwasher under the bolt head. Ride safe,
Roy