Polaris RZR Forum - RZR Forums.net banner

2016 Polaris ACE 900 SP First Ride & Review

11K views 15 replies 9 participants last post by  XP 1000  
#1 ·
Image

To say that a march of horsepower-soaked machines have been high-stepping out of the Polaris facilities in 2016 is an understatement. It seems like each machine has more horsepower and torque than the last. This attention to displacement and muscle did not skip over the ACE line in 2016 either. The single-seat, sit-in ATV has only been a thing for two short years, and already we are spoiled for choice with engine configurations. Model year 2016 sees the addition of the ACE 900 SP.

Image

This compact newcomer to the off-road marketplace came as a surprise to most buyers, as it was a machine that they didn't even know that they needed in the garage. At the behest of significant others and kids all across the nation, the ACE made it's way into the toy hauler, and smiles were had by all. The ACE mixes the small-footprint of an ATV with the ergonomics, seating position, controls and roll cage of a side-by-side. "The best of both worlds,” as it were.

Image

The ACE 900 SP shares the Sportsman platform of the other ACE models, but a detuned Prostar 900 motor has been shoehorned just behind the seat to offer up 60hp. In other machines this motor has been known to produce a few more horsepowers, but with the ACE weighing in 184lbs lighter than the RZR 900, 60hp is more than enough to power this lightweight billygoat down the trail with great haste. It's compact footprint combined with that level of horsepower means that a driver needs to be awake to drive this thing quickly. The 325 and 570 iterations of this machine lent toward the "mat it and go" driving style, but the 900 SP is a whole new ballgame. Calculated throttle positioning is absolutely necessary.

Image

The 900 SP comes standard with EPS, which was sorely missed in the 325 and the 570, although it was an optional feature. It is not quite as quick steering as I would have liked while driving fast, but in talking to the engineers, this was by design. They consciously slowed the steering down due to the footprint of the machine. Quicker steering is handy when going fast, but it can get a driver into trouble more quickly as well. The steering made me look a little further down the trail than I would normally, and assessment of trail conditions and undulations well in advance are necessary in the ACE 900 SP. Preparedness will keep the round black parts of the ACE on the trail.

Read More here: 2016 Polaris ACE 900 SP First Ride & Review
 
#6 ·
I agree with the OP about the steering. That was probably my biggest negative when I drove the 900. Trying to carry speed through tight trails that switched back and forth was difficult because of the amount of turns the wheel took. The 900 is a blast, but I'd have to do something about the steering ratios immediately if I got one.
 
#7 ·
Could it be the alignment? our 2014 325 was delivered with some serious toe out...Polaris dealer claims the Ace needed this for better handling?. NO ATV I have ever owned had this much toe!!
\

IMO it was not setup correctly from the factory as the owners manual says 1/4 toe out (1/8" per side) and mine was more like 1/4" per side close to 3/4" toe out!! When I mounted the plow it looked really really awkward.
The ace is now set to 0" toe and it handles MUCH better, granted ours is manual steering not EPS
 
#8 ·
It may be alignment, but the technician that was there agreed with me. He thought it needed to be tighter too. It bit nicely and handled well, but the amount of rotations you had to give the wheel seemed way off. I've never felt that large of a mismatch in steering ratios on any vehicle I've ever driven.

Maybe the 900 has different ratios than the 320/570 due to them wanting people not to be too aggressive? It could be a simple fix if that is the case. Swap steering units and be done with it.
 
#9 ·
I heard they are set up with different ratios due to rollover effect of drivers. Narrow width machines will take more input to reduce risk of accidents.


Sent from my iPad using My thumbs
 
#10 ·
I hate band aids like this..... how about you just put EPS on it like all the other cars and let the drivers learn what the vehicle can and cannot do, it should not be some weird learning curve to hop in this machine?
With that said I wonder if its just a matter of some seat time?

Personally I like to feel connected to the wheel meaning, I turn the steering wheel the tires turn at a similar ratio...I hate all this drive by wire crap!!!

Now I am really curious to drive one of these suckers as I have many many hours of seat time in the 325!