Nice call stew.
All:
TG uses the card-board top inner media seal and the good media while UG uses a metal one and the good media. Either offers some of the best filtration I can find (damn, now I sound like a f'n commercial). I have no hesitation using either.
Many folks that buy into the cut-open method as something meaningfull seemingly subscribe to a few interesting beliefs. Some like the cardboard because it won't rust no matter what shelf it sat on, and it's cheaper. Other think it means it's "cheap" and won't have anything to do with it. I've seen little to nothing to suggest that carboard seal is actually flawed though. You'd have to ask them why it matters so much, I can't really explain it.
Anyway, if you'll spend some time reading on BITOG this has been done to death, and in some cases by some pretty talented guys. If you look enough Fram had one of the product managers answering questions for a few years too (I've been reading BITOG off and on since Bob started it).
Mind you I don't want to undermine anybody's belief. Heck it ain't my machine, and this ain't life or death. I can offer onlyi this: As an analyst I had to learn to avoid things like confirmation bias, and ultimately learned to seek hard data and large sample sets. For me the litmus of a filter isn't in a Youtube video of a cut-down, it's in something called "beta ratios". Once you get into the mertrics of actual peformance it's pretty obvious.
Lets also agree a Wix or a Purolater is hardly bottom feeder filters. Best no longer, but pretty darn good? Sure!
But to each his own, and God speed to all.
-d