How come there's no love for Torque? - Polaris RZR Forum - RZR Forums.net
Engine and Drivetrain For discussion of drivetrain and engine performance and maintenance

 11Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 02:02 PM Thread Starter
 
Paxx's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2014 XP1K with lots of goodies!
Member #70266
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 294
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Paxx's Photo Gallery(2)
How come there's no love for Torque?

So I'm curious - I've been diving into clutch tuning theory and everything I can find online suggests that you need to tune for peak HP and there is never any mention of peak torque.

So using an N/A XP1000 as our example, the way I understand things at this point is that you want to jump up to approx 8250-8300rpm as soon as possible and hold it there. Why wouldn't you want to aim for peak torque, which I believe is about 7500rpm (someone correct me if I'm wrong), for the shift curve before hitting full shift out?

Once you hit shift out, you would then want to climb to peak HP and hold at that point. To me, that would seem to make sense, as you would be in the peak torque range if your load changes while climbing through your shift curve and then once you finally hit shift out, your peak HP will hold you there.

Can someone explain to me my the torque peak is never mentioned in the clutch tuning discussions?

Or let me know if I'm off base on my assumptions in any way. I'm looking to expand my knowledge on the technical aspects of this sport.

Cheers!
442raceRZR likes this.

2014 XP1K

BoonDocker Ripp Tied Clutch w/Heelclicker Kit - Special Carriers A-Arms - ZRP High Clearance Radius Rods - RacerTech steering arms - Method 401's - 32" BFG KM3's - Shock Therapy Stage 3 kit and sway bar - SSV Works overhead 4 - Mastercraft 5 points - Polaris half windshield - 4-6" A-pillar light bars - ProArmor Doors - Sawgrip chainsaw mount - ISOTA full box - Spring Brake Thingy - Drake extinguisher mount ...and a never ending wish list!
Paxx is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 03:44 PM
 
Max H's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2018 XPT 2 seat
Member #16311
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 747
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Max H's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Good question ...I think I know the answer but I cant explain it .....so I will wait for someone more intelligent than me to respond
Max H is offline  
post #3 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 03:49 PM
 
sandblster's Avatar
 
Member #46247
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 3,431
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View sandblster's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

I think the torque comes in when it back shifts under load. If you really want toque, get a turbo. Great torque at lower speed. The non turbo needs the rpm for power. We have a 17 non turbo and a 18 turbo. With the turbo one needs a lot less throttle to climb the same hill the 17 does with foot to floor. One needs to get the rpm's up on the 17 and hold them. With the turbo, power on tap any time. Start a long climb and if you need more power just tap and away you go.
ckr likes this.

I'm an Outdoor adventurer and I Vote and pay taxes.
sandblster is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 04:35 PM
 
442raceRZR's Avatar
 
My RZR: 2009 RZR 800 S
Member #264074
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Santee, CA
Posts: 231
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View 442raceRZR's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

These have plenty of low end torque. Torque gets ya out of the hole. HP gets you across the finish line. Need a balance. HP is a by product of Torque.

TEAM PISTELAK - #442raceRZR - facebook.com/teampistelak - instagram.com/teampistelak - twitter @TPistelak
AMA D38 - Sportsman UTV
Windansea Coffee / Mass Depot / MassFX / Frank Motors / Blud Lubricants / GL Performance Coatings / M&M Offroad / Big Gun Exhaust / TireJect / RynoPower / SuperATV.com / AG Sandcars / Filterwears / Austin Hose
2009 Polaris RZR 800S
442raceRZR is offline  
post #5 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 06:46 PM
 
Highrider's Avatar
 
My RZR: 2019 Rock & Trails & 2015 Polaris 1000 2 seater
Member #54711
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Wonderful Wyoming
Posts: 953
Garage
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
View Highrider's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

I am with Paxx on torque concerns..
Have been clutching for way way to may years.
From the CVT system in snowmobiles in the early 70's to the now RZR's
( same concept)

I always clutch for torque- just not a lot of people understand the helix in the secondary as it loads the motor - Depending on what you looking for -
I never ever use the lazy helix in the stock machines- especially in the xp 1000's so so much torque left on the table with that flat helix.

Get the torque load with the helix-correct- weights in the primary (placement) to carry the added load but not so much enough so you can't achieve top rpm AND maintain-it.
You have to have the springs to complement the changes and ALL SPRINGS are not the same.. as an example... A 60/150 spring from EPI is not the same as a 60/150 from team as they all measure initial compression at different heights.

Most don't want to mess with it, and just buy a clutch kit- but how many clutch kits do you see with weights springs AND a helix for elevation!!!!

I have my helix's made at Venom and they cut what I need/want...

Sorry been so long winded- but there are clutching improvements instead of just adding HP and just head for the turbo line up-
BTW that clutch system in stock form is way lazy..IMHO
Gary0628 likes this.

2019 XP 1000 Trails and Rocks
Highrider is offline  
post #6 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 08:09 PM Thread Starter
 
Paxx's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2014 XP1K with lots of goodies!
Member #70266
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 294
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Paxx's Photo Gallery(2)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandblster View Post
I think the torque comes in when it back shifts under load.
This is an interesting thought - So you are suggesting the machine is tuned for peak HP because when you get hit with a load, ie. a steep hill, etc. the backshift will place the RPM into the torque peak and then pull you hard back into the HP peak?

2014 XP1K

BoonDocker Ripp Tied Clutch w/Heelclicker Kit - Special Carriers A-Arms - ZRP High Clearance Radius Rods - RacerTech steering arms - Method 401's - 32" BFG KM3's - Shock Therapy Stage 3 kit and sway bar - SSV Works overhead 4 - Mastercraft 5 points - Polaris half windshield - 4-6" A-pillar light bars - ProArmor Doors - Sawgrip chainsaw mount - ISOTA full box - Spring Brake Thingy - Drake extinguisher mount ...and a never ending wish list!
Paxx is offline  
post #7 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 08:20 PM Thread Starter
 
Paxx's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2014 XP1K with lots of goodies!
Member #70266
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 294
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Paxx's Photo Gallery(2)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highrider View Post
I am with Paxx on torque concerns..
Have been clutching for way way to may years.
From the CVT system in snowmobiles in the early 70's to the now RZR's
( same concept)

I always clutch for torque- just not a lot of people understand the helix in the secondary as it loads the motor - Depending on what you looking for -
I never ever use the lazy helix in the stock machines- especially in the xp 1000's so so much torque left on the table with that flat helix.

Get the torque load with the helix-correct- weights in the primary (placement) to carry the added load but not so much enough so you can't achieve top rpm AND maintain-it.
You have to have the springs to complement the changes and ALL SPRINGS are not the same.. as an example... A 60/150 spring from EPI is not the same as a 60/150 from team as they all measure initial compression at different heights.

Most don't want to mess with it, and just buy a clutch kit- but how many clutch kits do you see with weights springs AND a helix for elevation!!!!

I have my helix's made at Venom and they cut what I need/want...

Sorry been so long winded- but there are clutching improvements instead of just adding HP and just head for the turbo line up-
BTW that clutch system in stock form is way lazy..IMHO
So in saying all that, do you aim for Peak Torque (7500rpm) on the holeshot with climbing RPM up to Peak HP (8300rpm), or do you aim for a straight shift at 7500rpm, straight shift at 8300rpm, or something in-between?

2014 XP1K

BoonDocker Ripp Tied Clutch w/Heelclicker Kit - Special Carriers A-Arms - ZRP High Clearance Radius Rods - RacerTech steering arms - Method 401's - 32" BFG KM3's - Shock Therapy Stage 3 kit and sway bar - SSV Works overhead 4 - Mastercraft 5 points - Polaris half windshield - 4-6" A-pillar light bars - ProArmor Doors - Sawgrip chainsaw mount - ISOTA full box - Spring Brake Thingy - Drake extinguisher mount ...and a never ending wish list!

Last edited by Paxx; June 25th, 2019 at 09:09 PM.
Paxx is offline  
post #8 of 37 Old June 25th, 2019, 08:45 PM
 
sandblster's Avatar
 
Member #46247
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 3,431
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View sandblster's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Torque is an interesting subject. Couple of ways to make HP, torque or RPM's. Ford is making new engine based on old school, single cam, push rods, cast-iron block, heavy lower end. A long stoke engine will produce lots of torque at low RPM. The Ford engine max torque is at 2000 RPM. Diesel engines are long stoke and make lots of torque at low RPM's. Most modern car engine are small and use RPM to produce HP. Racing engines use lots of RPM's to make HP. Our RZR engine idle just below 2000 RPM. Small engine needs lots of RPM to make power, unless they are turbo'ed. Then more fuel/air in forced making a bigger bang on top of piston = more power at lower RPM.

Have worked on the 17 XP1000 a lot with clutching. When it was not working at the 8400 to 8600 RPM it was flat on power. A big noticeable lack of power. One had to keep the power on hard to make some dunes. With things right, it has so much more power. Needs less throttle to safely climb the same dunes easy.

One other issue with torque. A torque engine needs more cooling as the heat of combustion is held in the cylinder longer, transferring more heat to block, etc.. As the RZR turbo did not have enough cooling the first year, as an example. Also a torque engine needs it's oil cooled because of the more pressure on lower end. Oil is a lube and coolant.

To clutch an XP engine to work in it's max torque area, I believe one would be very disappointed. Of course a lot depends on where and how one rides. The XP1000 engine is a great engine with lots of power. The turbo is a big step above mainly do to the torque it can produce. It was the biggest surprise I had with the turbo as had not seen anyone talking about how much torque it has. Just not possible to get lots of torque out of a very small engine without forced induction. Torque needs long stroke or forced induction.

Some things to think on.

I'm an Outdoor adventurer and I Vote and pay taxes.
sandblster is offline  
post #9 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 07:09 AM
 
Highrider's Avatar
 
My RZR: 2019 Rock & Trails & 2015 Polaris 1000 2 seater
Member #54711
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Wonderful Wyoming
Posts: 953
Garage
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
View Highrider's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxx View Post
So in saying all that, do you aim for Peak Torque (7500rpm) on the holeshot with climbing RPM up to Peak HP (8300rpm), or do you aim for a straight shift at 7500rpm, straight shift at 8300rpm, or something in-between?
What I aim for is what the motor likes.
Good holeshot-hard pulling all the way through but still achieving max rpm, top speed and maintaining it.
Coming up on a incline, rpm should hold, not be lazy falling ever so lightly and wait for the backshift. It should be instant!

If the helix is to steep or to shallow it (the motor) tends hits that invisible wall.
Most don't even recognize this, and think since they are hitting 8300 -8350 they are ok and that all she has got... till one goes past you generally mid way ( because torque) you cant catch it, you have run out of legs.
Sandblster is correct 8400- 8550 is where it's at.

A lazy backshift to hold rpm is annoying and that what most of these have from factory- They run ok that most don't mess with it- until they ride in a completely stock machine or comparable machine that has been clutched properly.

Most might not agree with the above comments- and that is OK... but I have to clutch RZR's for over 9,000' elevation where we live and ride- and since the air is so thin up here- clutching is paramount- we have lost the HP#'s( 110hp from the XP1000) that the lower elevation guys still maintain.
Even the RZR turbo's benefit from a properly set-up machine,and we haven't even got into spring combinations yet.

2019 XP 1000 Trails and Rocks
Highrider is offline  
post #10 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 09:05 AM Thread Starter
 
Paxx's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2014 XP1K with lots of goodies!
Member #70266
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 294
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Paxx's Photo Gallery(2)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

This is a good conversation, thanks for the input from everyone so far.

As I've been playing around with my tuning, I've been reducing flyweight and seeing increased performance as a result of each reduction in weight. I've now hit a point where all the weight has been removed from the arms and the pull is amazing compared to stock but I am borderline slipping belt under mid to high load and this is at the lowest elevation that I ride at, 2200' +/-.

It's currently a climbing RPM tune, hits 8000rpm by 35kph and then slowly climbs to 8400rpm by 80kph.

I live in a valley and on my local rides, I will go from 2500' up to 6000'+. The machine is great at the 2000-2500' (other than the minor slipping) but obviously didn't perform nearly as well on my trip up into the mountains.

I've been looking into it and chatted with a few pros and I've now ordered 2 new springs to try, one for the primary and one for the secondary. Both of my current primary and secondary springs had a finishing force of 260. I've ordered a replacement primary with a force of 295 and a secondary with a force of 300 so that I can weight up the arms for reduced slippage, and have adjustment again in the higher elevations.

I'll try each one out and see if I prefer the added backshift of the increased force in the secondary or if it responds better with just the increased force in the primary. I'll also check to see if my sheave temps stay balanced or not.

My understanding is that having more weight on the arms will make you a little less susceptible to elevation change. If that holds true I will likely try and find a (rare) straight stretch at around 4000' and tune for that elevation.

So getting back to the discussion on torque, when I start dialling my setup back in for the higher elevation, don't worry so much about where the stated torque peak is on paper? Just tune for the feel of the machine and a snappy backshift?

Haha, a little bit of a long-winded approach to ask a simple question! Just helps my thought process to write things out I suppose.

2014 XP1K

BoonDocker Ripp Tied Clutch w/Heelclicker Kit - Special Carriers A-Arms - ZRP High Clearance Radius Rods - RacerTech steering arms - Method 401's - 32" BFG KM3's - Shock Therapy Stage 3 kit and sway bar - SSV Works overhead 4 - Mastercraft 5 points - Polaris half windshield - 4-6" A-pillar light bars - ProArmor Doors - Sawgrip chainsaw mount - ISOTA full box - Spring Brake Thingy - Drake extinguisher mount ...and a never ending wish list!
Paxx is offline  
post #11 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 09:12 AM
 
sandblster's Avatar
 
Member #46247
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 3,431
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View sandblster's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

One thing you need to REALLY do is check the clutch alignment before you do all the tuning. If that is wrong noting else works as it should. All my clutching problems went away once the clutch alignment was set correctly. Very critical that is done first.
Highrider likes this.

I'm an Outdoor adventurer and I Vote and pay taxes.
sandblster is offline  
post #12 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 10:11 AM Thread Starter
 
Paxx's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2014 XP1K with lots of goodies!
Member #70266
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 294
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Paxx's Photo Gallery(2)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Good point - I did buy the tools from Boondocker to align the belt and the shafts but I haven't checked them yet.

2014 XP1K

BoonDocker Ripp Tied Clutch w/Heelclicker Kit - Special Carriers A-Arms - ZRP High Clearance Radius Rods - RacerTech steering arms - Method 401's - 32" BFG KM3's - Shock Therapy Stage 3 kit and sway bar - SSV Works overhead 4 - Mastercraft 5 points - Polaris half windshield - 4-6" A-pillar light bars - ProArmor Doors - Sawgrip chainsaw mount - ISOTA full box - Spring Brake Thingy - Drake extinguisher mount ...and a never ending wish list!
Paxx is offline  
post #13 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 10:14 AM
 
Highrider's Avatar
 
My RZR: 2019 Rock & Trails & 2015 Polaris 1000 2 seater
Member #54711
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Wonderful Wyoming
Posts: 953
Garage
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
View Highrider's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Paxx-
Just remember if your trying to achieve backshift with a heavier secondary spring rate, keep in mind your facing in creating more heat, as the secondary is working harder to compress the spring. So baby steps

People don't believe the light spring rates I run, but it's in the helix that will allow lighter rates with zero heat and snappy backshifts.
It's an art- and doesn't come cheap, as I have a shelf full of trials and errors...LOL

2019 XP 1000 Trails and Rocks

Last edited by Highrider; June 26th, 2019 at 10:25 AM.
Highrider is offline  
post #14 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 10:57 AM Thread Starter
 
Paxx's Avatar
 
First Name: Max
My RZR: 2014 XP1K with lots of goodies!
Member #70266
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 294
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
View Paxx's Photo Gallery(2)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highrider View Post
Paxx-
Just remember if your trying to achieve backshift with a heavier secondary spring rate, keep in mind your facing in creating more heat, as the secondary is working harder to compress the spring. So baby steps

People don't believe the light spring rates I run, but it's in the helix that will allow lighter rates with zero heat and snappy backshifts.
It's an art- and doesn't come cheap, as I have a shelf full of trials and errors...LOL
Haha, I believe that! with the shipping rate to get these springs up to Canada, I'm paying about $75/spring, not to mention all the other clutch parts!

My clutch is a bit of an unusual set-up with the Boondocker and the primary has an extremely low engagement force of 45. That is the initial reason I bought the secondary spring, I needed the extra spring force for the increased weights, and I was told that there wasn't a spring for the primary with a low enough engagement force and a 300 finish force. With that said I ordered the 180/300 secondary spring.

I started getting worried about too much backshift with that increased secondary force so I started hunting around again for a primary spring and managed to find a venom vintage snow series of springs. Ordered up a 65/295. I have a 1/4" spacer under the primary spring I can pull out to keep my engagement in check.

The secondary spring had already shipped by the time I found the primary so I figured I would toss it in and see what happens for my own knowledge. I have an infrared heat gun that I can use to check the sheave temps after a good pull so I can try and find the right combo with balanced heat.

The goal isn't really to achieve more backshift, it is to allow more flyweight. I do have a two-track helix that I can play with as well. Track 1 is a 64-60 and track 2 is a 57-53. I think it is set from Boondocker on track 1 but I will have to check when I pull it to start playing with the springs.

Now that I'm typing this, I guess I could have simply tried the shallower helix to bring up my RPM and then add more weight, couldn't I? Would essentially achieve a similar effect to the stiffer secondary spring, correct?

2014 XP1K

BoonDocker Ripp Tied Clutch w/Heelclicker Kit - Special Carriers A-Arms - ZRP High Clearance Radius Rods - RacerTech steering arms - Method 401's - 32" BFG KM3's - Shock Therapy Stage 3 kit and sway bar - SSV Works overhead 4 - Mastercraft 5 points - Polaris half windshield - 4-6" A-pillar light bars - ProArmor Doors - Sawgrip chainsaw mount - ISOTA full box - Spring Brake Thingy - Drake extinguisher mount ...and a never ending wish list!
Paxx is offline  
post #15 of 37 Old June 26th, 2019, 11:51 AM
 
Highrider's Avatar
 
My RZR: 2019 Rock & Trails & 2015 Polaris 1000 2 seater
Member #54711
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Wonderful Wyoming
Posts: 953
Garage
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
View Highrider's Photo Gallery(0)
Re: How come there's no love for Torque?



Paxx -Just remember mixing spring MFG's have different inital compression rates as they are measured differently but sold as a constant.. as mentioned in my earlier post... but you seem to be pretty savvy...

In theory what you have asked is true to a point. Placement of your adjustable weights within your weights have an effect on running RPM but don't be to scared to add tip weight so your pulling through to the top instead of just getting there.

Have you done the old snowmobilers trick and mark your primary & secondary to ensure your getting a full shift out?

2019 XP 1000 Trails and Rocks
Highrider is offline  
Reply

Tags
clutch springs , clutch tuning , clutch weights , helix , primary clutch

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Polaris RZR Forum - RZR Forums.net forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome