| General RZR Discussion For General Polaris RZR discussion |
Welcome to RZRForums.net - the ultimate Polaris RZR related forum and discussion board!
Register for Free Now!
Currently it appears that you browsing the forums as a guest, which means you will be limited on searching, viewing, downloading and participating! By Joining our FREE forums today you will receive discounts from our official vendors, updates about rides and events in your area, and access to upload your own photos.
Remember, we are the leading RZR Enthusiasts forum on the web, with more than 5 times the users as any other site. Join now, and start posting in our New Members section today!
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 08:39 AM
|
|
|
|
My RZR: RZR S
Location: Shelley, ID.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 160
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
I think I'm sold. I know I'm being a bit paranoid, but I'm extremely pissed that I had to spend 1500 to get my motor rebuilt (even though my machine was still under warranty). I'm not going through it again.
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 10:17 AM
|
 |
|
|
First Name: Lynn
My RZR: 2008
Location: North Salt Lake, Ut
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 83
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Below is the post from Megadesertdisel regarding dyno info on the UMP:
Re: Is there an intake fix???! Sick to my stomach!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i am doing some testing with air boxes.
first off my stock airbox sucked sand at 20 hrs and POPO warrantied the work to fix it. so out with the stocker i went.
i have a UMP and it filters great with no dirt in the TB. but this filtration came with a price. it was loss of hp. 2.11 hp less than stock to be exact. flows less air which is less hp.
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 10:54 AM
|
 |
Rhino defector
|
|
First Name: Mike
My RZR: green gen 3 racer
Location: Mesa, AZ
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 536
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
yup thats me. filtration comes with a price.
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 11:25 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Sandy, UT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 342
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Would love to see the DF system dyno'ed to see what how it stacks up.
Hey Jason...how about sending a demo to borrow for Mega to test out?
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 11:27 AM
|
|
|
|
My RZR: RZR S
Location: Shelley, ID.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 160
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
I called and check on the delivery of my RZR S, it'll be in next friday. I also talked to them about the air intake problem. their advice, go with DFR (I didn't ask them about it, they suggested it). Anyways, they can get it in cheaper then I can, so it too is on order.
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 12:39 PM
|
 |
|
|
My RZR: 08 gen 3
Location: upstate south carolina
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 232
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy48065
You guys are getting a little carried away with the filter size thing. The Rzr runs great with a brand-new stock paper filter doesn't it? Does doubling the filter size get you any real increase in power? I doubt it could be measured. Some facts:
Stock 4x7 filter = 88 sq. in. of surface area
P181050 filter in UMP is a 4x10 filter = 125 sq. in. - A nearly 50% increase.
P181054 filter in BTI is a 6x12 filter = 339 sq. in.
So the Donaldson filter used by UMP is already a 50% improvement over the stock filter but it isn't for more power--it's to hold more shit. The stock filter holds a lot of shit, too, but the issue is how much of the nearly unmeasurable fine dust that gets through it.
Someone over at PRC posted some interesting filter facts many months ago. I don't know who, what or when and I'm not going to go dig it up but the essence of it was this:
Say Brand X filter traps 99.8% of 10 micron particles and is considered an excellent filter.
Brand Y traps 99.9% so it's only .1% better and probably not worth the bother, right? Wrong! It's 100% better because the amount that got through was 1/2 what Brand X passed. That makes Brand Y an amazing filter even though it would be very hard to measure or see such a small difference.
|
Well said.....i cant measure hp for sure. but i can compare. I raced a buddy of mine that got one about the same time.. i did a few times..we were about the same everytime.... put on snorkel and BTI and beat him by ALOT everytime.....later met MUDWIESER(another member) for a trail ride. great guy...never met him before... raced him that day. he has a gibson pipe and a fuel controler and we were side by side....he just bought the BTI/DFR because of it. can't tell you increases but can tell how my machined changed...if something comes out better please let me know...i will change!!!
__________________
'05 Ranger XP
'08 RZR born april 4
ITP SS112 rims, Super Grip '26 tires, '1 spacers, '2 rubberdown lift, rockslider nerf bars, UHMW custom skid,Viper 4500 winch, BTI snorkel box, Extreme snorkel kit, brush guards front n rear, lock n ride box and gas can holders, top, map bag, underdash bag, ext. fenders. front and rear cv/A arm guards high lifter springs{powder coated 'em red to match},lone star frame gussets,
|
 |
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 63
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
That wold definately put DFR +1 in my book if they could dyno there filter on a standard rzr and come out = or above stock HP levels (I'm sure it would put UMP out of the running for a performance fix to the issue) and definately justify the DFR price tag.
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 01:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
I just called BTI the MFR of the CYCLONE and they are going DYNO the stock filter then compare it with the CYCLONE. Hope to see the results. of course we all know what that outcome will be. As far as the UMP goes They said they are not concerned with that filter due to its smaller size etc..
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 05:04 PM
|
 |
|
|
First Name: RUSTY GERBER
My RZR: 2008 GENERATION 1
Location: FRESNO, CA. ( SANGER )
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 507
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
ready for that news - wish BTI would have a bigger inlet
__________________
Polaris RZR - build date - 6-15-2007 - Black ITP True Beadlock Wheels with Polished Rings.26"- 6x9x14 front, 6x11x14 Maxxis Bighorn Tires rear, 1.5” adapters - total width in rear of 63"
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 07:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
If you had one on your RR you wouldn't be saying that. It doesn't need to be bigger believe me!!!
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 07:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Keowee1 - Post some pics of your RZR. Would like to see your set-up..
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 5th, 2008, 07:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Quote:
Originally Posted by keowee1
Well said.....i cant measure hp for sure. but i can compare. I raced a buddy of mine that got one about the same time.. i did a few times..we were about the same everytime.... put on snorkel and BTI and beat him by ALOT everytime.....later met MUDWIESER(another member) for a trail ride. great guy...never met him before... raced him that day. he has a gibson pipe and a fuel controler and we were side by side....he just bought the BTI/DFR because of it. can't tell you increases but can tell how my machined changed...if something comes out better please let me know...i will change!!!
|
Post some pics of your RZR ...would like to see the set-up
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 6th, 2008, 09:42 AM
|
 |
|
|
My RZR: 08 gen 3
Location: upstate south carolina
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 232
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Will do...have to be monday....its at the shop..trying to get the dragonfire throttle body and controler worked out...not going well
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 6th, 2008, 05:08 PM
|
 |
Everything Aftermarket
|
|
First Name: Jordan
Location: Mesa AZ
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 273
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Give me a call Bro and i will do my best to walk you through the tuning but the best person would be our Main tech. and that would have to be on monday
|
 |
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake |
 |

September 15th, 2008, 09:33 PM
|
|
|
|
First Name: MJ
Location: St. George Utah
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 74
|
|
|
Re: BTI vs FDR Air Intake
Just ordered a UMP. If DFR/BTI came down to $350 It would own this market.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:36 AM. |
|
|
|